Back to Blog
Platform ComparisonsNovember 20257 min read

Flowise vs Uplizd: Battle of the LangChain Visual Builders 2025

Both visual LLM builders on LangChain. Compare Flowise (Node.js) vs Uplizd (Python).

Share:

Here's the truth about Flowise vs Uplizd: they're cousins, not competitors.

Both are visual LLM workflow builders. Both are built on LangChain. Both are excellent. But they're designed for different stages of your AI journey.

Flowise = learning and prototyping. Uplizd = production and scale.

Let me show you exactly which one fits your needs (spoiler: you might use both at different stages).

LangChain family hero


TL;DR: The One-Minute Answer

QuestionFlowiseUplizd
FoundationLangChain (Node.js/JavaScript)LangChain (Python)
Best ForLearning, solo projects, prototypesProduction SaaS, enterprises, scale
ComplexitySimpler, beginner-friendlyMore powerful, enterprise-grade
Self-Hosting✅ Free (open-source MIT)✅ Business tier ($599/mo with support)
Cloud Pricing$35/month$19/month (Starter)
Multi-Tenancy❌ Not supported✅ Native, per-customer isolation
LLM Cost Optimization❌ None✅ 99.9% savings via caching
AI Copilot❌ None✅ Generates workflows from text
Real TCO (with AI)$185/month (cloud) or $350/month (self-host)$24/month

Bottom Line: Flowise = excellent for learning and solo projects (free self-host). Uplizd = built for production and enterprises (99.9% LLM savings, multi-tenancy). Both excellent—choose based on your stage.


The Similarity: They're Both LangChain Visual Builders

Before we dive into differences, let's acknowledge what they share:

Both platforms offer:

  • Visual drag-and-drop workflow builders
  • Built on LangChain (the industry-standard framework)
  • Open-source foundations
  • Support for RAG, agents, vector databases
  • All major LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.)
  • Active communities

They're not enemies—they're cousins in the LangChain family.


The Core Difference: Node.js vs Python, Learning vs Production

Language and philosophy comparison

Flowise: JavaScript, Simplicity, Learning

Philosophy: Make LangChain accessible to JavaScript developers and beginners

  • Language: Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript
  • Target user: Solo developers, students, prototypers
  • Self-hosting: Free (MIT open-source)
  • Cloud: $35/month (hosted for you)
  • Complexity: Simple → Medium workflows
  • Best for: Learning LangChain, side projects, prototypes

Example user: A frontend developer learning AI who wants to experiment with RAG chatbots on weekends. Free self-hosting on a $5 VPS.


Uplizd: Python, Power, Production

Philosophy: Make production AI workflows affordable and scalable

  • Language: Python (with LangChain support)
  • Target user: SaaS builders, AI engineers, enterprises
  • Self-hosting: Business tier ($599/mo with support + SLA)
  • Cloud: $19-599/month (starts cheaper than Flowise!)
  • Complexity: Simple → Very Complex workflows
  • Best for: Multi-tenant SaaS, enterprise AI, production apps with 99.9% LLM cost savings

Example user: A startup founder building an AI-powered SaaS product for 500 customers, needs multi-tenancy, and wants to minimize $5K/month LLM costs down to $50/month.


Real-World Example: RAG-Powered Customer Support Bot

Let's build the same chatbot with both platforms and compare costs.

Scenario: 2,000 customer conversations/month with knowledge base search (10,000 documents)

With Flowise (Free Self-Host, But Hidden Costs)

Flowise self-host cost breakdown

StepCostNotes
1. Flowise platform$0Free (MIT open-source) ✅
2. Infrastructure$200/monthVPS, PostgreSQL, Redis, backups
3. LLM API calls$150/monthOpenAI/Anthropic at full price (no caching)
4. DevOps time10-20 hours/monthUpdates, monitoring, troubleshooting

Total monthly cost:

Flowise License:      $0 (open-source)
Infrastructure:       $200/month (you manage servers)
OpenAI API:           $150/month (no caching)
──────────────────────────────────
TOTAL (Self-Host):    $350/month

If using Flowise Cloud:

Flowise Cloud:        $35/month (hosted for you)
OpenAI API:           $150/month (no caching)
──────────────────────────────────
TOTAL (Cloud):        $185/month

Pros:

  • ✅ Free platform license (open-source)
  • ✅ Excellent tutorials (great for learning)
  • ✅ Node.js environment (familiar to web devs)

Cons:

  • ❌ $350/month total cost (self-host) or $185/month (cloud)
  • ❌ No LLM caching (pay full price every time)
  • ❌ No multi-tenancy (can't isolate customers)
  • ❌ 10-20 hours/month DevOps work (self-host)

With Uplizd (All-Inclusive, Cost-Optimized)

Uplizd AI Copilot generating RAG bot

StepCostNotes
1. Uplizd platform$19/monthIncludes everything (infrastructure, hosting, support)
2. LLM API (cached)$5/month99% cache hit rate on support queries
3. Vector DB$0Included (Qdrant, Pinecone, Chroma)
4. DevOps time0 hoursWe manage everything

Total monthly cost:

Uplizd Starter:       $19/month (managed hosting + features)
LLM API (cached):     $5/month (99% cache hit rate)
Vector DB:            $0 (included)
──────────────────────────────────
TOTAL:                $24/month

Pros:

  • ✅ 87% cheaper than Flowise cloud ($24 vs $185)
  • ✅ 93% cheaper than Flowise self-host ($24 vs $350)
  • ✅ LLM caching = 99% cost reduction
  • ✅ Multi-tenancy built-in (isolate 500 customers)
  • ✅ AI Copilot generates workflows (2 minutes vs hours)
  • ✅ Zero DevOps work (we manage everything)

Cons:

  • ❌ Not free (but much cheaper total cost than Flowise)
  • ❌ Self-hosting requires Business tier ($599/mo)

Cost Comparison: The Complete Picture

Dramatic cost comparison

Flowise Pricing

OptionPlatform CostInfrastructureLLM CostsTotal/Month
Self-Host$0 (MIT license)$200 (you manage)$150 (no caching)$350
Cloud$35$0 (managed)$150 (no caching)$185

Hidden self-host costs:

  • Infrastructure: $100-300/month (VPS, database, backups)
  • DevOps time: 10-20 hours/month (updates, monitoring, scaling)
  • LLM API: Full price (no caching = $50-500/month)

Uplizd Pricing

TierPriceLLM BudgetWhat's Included
Free$0100K tokens/moShared workspace, all AI templates
Starter$191M tokens/moIsolated instance, SSO, 99% LLM caching
Pro$495M tokens/moPriority support, advanced analytics
Team$9920M tokens/moCollaboration, shared workflows
Business$599100M tokens/moSelf-host (K8s), SLA, dedicated support

Everything included:

  • Infrastructure (Kubernetes, PostgreSQL, Redis)
  • LLM caching (99.9% cost savings—this is the game-changer)
  • Vector databases (Qdrant, Pinecone, Chroma)
  • Multi-tenancy with per-customer isolation
  • Enterprise features (SSO, quotas, audit logs)

Real TCO: $19-599/month (no hidden costs, no DevOps time)


When to Use Which Platform

Choose Flowise if you're:

ScenarioWhy Flowise Wins
Learning LangChainExcellent tutorials, beginner-friendly docs
Building solo side projectFree self-hosting (MIT license)
Prototyping/MVPQuick experimentation without budget
Prefer Node.js/JavaScriptTypeScript environment, NPM ecosystem
Need free self-hostNo platform fees (you pay for servers only)
Small scale (<100 users)Simple workflows, no multi-tenancy needed

Ideal user: Solo developer, student, or prototype builder Real example: A JavaScript developer learning AI who wants to build a personal RAG chatbot on a $5/month Digital Ocean droplet.


Choose Uplizd if you're:

ScenarioWhy Uplizd Wins
Building multi-tenant SaaSNative per-customer isolation (databases, auth, quotas)
Need to minimize LLM costs99.9% savings = $5K/month → $50/month
Want enterprise featuresSSO, audit logs, SLA, dedicated support
Need AI CopilotGenerate workflows from natural language (10x faster)
Prefer Python ecosystemPython/FastAPI (AI/ML lingua franca)
Production applicationsEnterprise-grade reliability, auto-scaling
Large scale (1,000+ users)Multi-tenancy, per-tenant quotas, cost controls
Complex multi-agent systemsAdvanced orchestration, nested agents

Ideal user: SaaS founder, AI engineer, enterprise team Real example: A startup building an AI-powered customer support platform for 500 B2B customers, processing 100K conversations/month. Cost: $99/month (vs $5,000+ without LLM caching).


Feature Comparison: Where Each Shines

Core Workflow Engine

FeatureFlowiseUplizd
Visual Builder✅ Node-based drag-and-drop✅ Node-based
LangChain Support✅ JavaScript implementation✅ Python implementation
Open Source✅ MIT license⚠️ Business tier only
Custom Components✅ JavaScript/TypeScript✅ Python
Workflow ComplexitySimple → MediumSimple → Very Complex
Component Library~80 nodes100+ nodes

AI & LLM Features

FeatureFlowiseUplizd
RAG Pipelines✅ Supported✅ Supported + templates
AI Agents✅ Supported✅ Supported + multi-agent
Multi-Agent Systems⚠️ Basic✅ Advanced orchestration ⭐
Vector Databases✅ Pinecone, Qdrant, etc.✅ Qdrant, Pinecone, Chroma (included)
LLM ProvidersAll major providersAll major providers
LLM Cost Optimization❌ None✅ 99.9% savings ⭐
AI Copilot❌ None✅ Generate workflows from text ⭐

Big difference: Uplizd's LLM caching can save you $5,000-10,000/month on production AI apps. Flowise has no caching—you pay full LLM price every time.


Enterprise Features

FeatureFlowiseUplizd
Multi-Tenancy❌ Not supported✅ Native, per-customer isolation ⭐
SSO (SAML/OAuth)❌ Not supported✅ Starter tier+
Per-Tenant Quotas❌ Not supported✅ Native (LLM budget, API calls)
Audit Logs⚠️ Basic✅ Enterprise tier
SLA❌ Not available✅ Business tier (99.9% uptime)
Dedicated Support❌ Community only✅ Business tier

Migration Between Platforms

From Flowise to Uplizd (Common Path: Learning → Production)

Why migrate:

  • You've learned LangChain on Flowise (great!)
  • Now ready for production with customers
  • Need multi-tenancy, cost optimization, enterprise features

How to migrate:

  1. Export Flowise logic (note: no direct JSON import, but logic translates)
  2. Use Uplizd AI Copilot: Describe your Flowise workflow in natural language
  3. Copilot generates equivalent workflow (2-5 minutes, 80-90% automated)
  4. Connect integrations: Same LLM providers, same vector DBs
  5. Test and deploy: Uplizd's caching starts saving money immediately

Migration timeline from Flowise to Uplizd

Time: 10-30 minutes per workflow Difficulty: Easy (both use LangChain, logic translates well)

Real story: Many Uplizd customers started with Flowise to learn, then migrated to Uplizd when launching production SaaS products. This is a normal, healthy path!


From Uplizd to Flowise (Less Common: Downgrading for Free Self-Host)

Why migrate:

  • Want completely free self-hosting (no platform fees)
  • Solo project (don't need multi-tenancy)
  • Prefer Node.js environment

How:

  1. Export Uplizd workflow logic
  2. Recreate in Flowise (manual, but straightforward)
  3. Reconnect LLM providers and vector DBs
  4. Self-host on your infrastructure

Time: 15-45 minutes per workflow Trade-off: You save platform fees but lose LLM caching (pay 10-100x more for LLM calls)


Language Comparison: Node.js vs Python for AI

Flowise (Node.js/JavaScript)

Pros:

  • ✅ Familiar to web developers (JavaScript/TypeScript)
  • ✅ NPM ecosystem (huge package library)
  • ✅ Easier for frontend devs transitioning to AI

Cons:

  • ❌ Python dominates AI/ML ecosystem (fewer AI libraries)
  • ❌ Most cutting-edge AI tools are Python-first

Uplizd (Python)

Pros:

  • ✅ Python is AI/ML lingua franca (Transformers, PyTorch, scikit-learn)
  • ✅ More AI libraries and tools
  • ✅ Better for data science workflows

Cons:

  • ❌ Less familiar to pure web developers
  • ❌ Requires Python knowledge for custom components

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which is easier to learn? A: Flowise has better beginner tutorials (edge to Flowise). But Uplizd has AI Copilot that generates workflows for you (edge to Uplizd). Both are beginner-friendly in different ways.

Q: Which is better for production? A: Uplizd. Multi-tenancy, LLM cost optimization (99.9% savings), enterprise features, SLA. Flowise lacks these critical production features.

Q: Can I migrate from Flowise to Uplizd? A: Yes! Both use LangChain, so logic translates. Use Uplizd's AI Copilot to describe your Flowise workflow, and it generates the equivalent workflow in minutes. This is a common path: learn on Flowise, launch on Uplizd.

Q: Which has more components? A: Uplizd (~100+ components) vs Flowise (~80 components). But both cover the essentials (LLMs, vector DBs, agents, RAG).

Q: Which is cheaper? A: For self-hosting: Flowise ($0 platform fee, but you pay $200-500/month for infrastructure + LLM). For cloud: Uplizd ($19/month + $5 LLM with caching = $24 total vs Flowise $35 + $150 LLM = $185 total). For production: Uplizd is 87-93% cheaper due to LLM caching.

Q: Can I use both? A: Yes! Many developers use Flowise for learning and prototyping (free), then migrate to Uplizd for production (enterprise features + cost savings).


Key Takeaways

Flowise is Perfect For:

  • Learning LangChain (excellent tutorials)
  • Solo side projects (free self-hosting)
  • Prototyping (quick experiments without budget)
  • Node.js preference (JavaScript/TypeScript environment)
  • Small scale (<100 users, simple workflows)

Uplizd is Perfect For:

  • Production SaaS (multi-tenancy, enterprise features)
  • Minimizing LLM costs (99.9% savings = massive reduction)
  • Fast development (AI Copilot generates workflows)
  • Python ecosystem (AI/ML lingua franca)
  • Large scale (1,000+ users, complex multi-agent)
  • Enterprise needs (SSO, quotas, SLA, support)

The Learning-to-Production Path (Recommended):

  • Start with Flowise (learn LangChain for free)
  • Migrate to Uplizd when launching production SaaS
  • Save 87-93% on costs with LLM caching
  • Get enterprise features (multi-tenancy, SSO, SLA)

Ready to Try Uplizd?

Build production AI workflows with enterprise features:

  • 100K tokens/month free (try before you buy)
  • All 40+ AI templates (RAG, agents, multi-agent)
  • AI Copilot generates workflows (just describe what you need)
  • 99.9% LLM cost savings (instant cost reduction)
  • Cheaper than Flowise cloud ($19 vs $35, plus LLM savings)

Flowise for learning. Uplizd for production. Both excellent choices.

*Last Updated: November 2025

99.9% Cost Savings

Slash LLM costs dramatically

5-Min Setup

Production-ready instantly

From $19/mo

All-inclusive pricing

Ready to Transform Your AI Workflows?

Join forward-thinking teams building AI-powered applications without the DevOps overhead

Book a Demo